|
<<
^
>>
Date: 2000-02-01
FIDnet: Ueberwachung oeffentlicher US-Netze
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
Gerade weil im Akronym [FIDnet] die Kardinalstugend der
Treue anklingt, ist [wie beim schönen begriff "Sicherheit"]
doppeltes Misstrauen angebracht. De facto handelt sichs
beim dem Federal Intrusion Detection Network um ein ganz
ordinäres Überwachungsgesetz, das den gesetzlich
ermächtigten US-Behörden Zugriff auf alle Netze von
RegierungsStellen und anderen öffentlichen Institutionen
einräumen wird.
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
EPIC Calls for Withdrawal of "FIDNET" at Senate Hearing
The Senate Judiciary Committee today reviewed the
Administration's proposed National Plan for Information
Systems Protection. Civil liberties organizations have
criticized the proposal, and said that it will dramatically
expand government surveillance of the nation's
communications network. They have singled out the Federal
Intrusion Detection Network , "FIDNet", as raising far-
reaching threats to American citizens.
Marc Rotenberg, Executive Director of the Electronic Privacy
Information Center (EPIC), called the proposed FIDNet plan
contrary to the "the spirit of the federal wiretap statute, the
plain language of the federal Privacy Act, and the history of
the Fourth Amendment." He said that, "the FIDNet proposal,
as currently conceived, must simply be withdrawn. It is
impermissible in the United States to give a federal agency
such extensive surveillance authority."
EPIC also released a government memo at the hearing,
obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, which
indicates that the US Department of Justice is aware that the
FIDNet proposal may violate US law. Other records obtained
by EPIC show that government will use credit card records
and telephone toll records as part of its intrusions detection
system.
Rotenberg charged that the backers of the security plan were
"trying to apply twentieth century notions of national defense
to twenty-first century problems of communications security."
Last year EPIC warned that a similar Critical Infrastructure
Program posed to the civil liberties of Americans. The revised
security plan discusses privacy issues in a number of
places, but civil liberties organizations contend that the panel
is long on rhetoric and short on safeguards.
"The Plan imply lacks the legal protections and independent
oversight that would be necessary to prevent abuse," said
EPIC.
Barry Steinhardt, Associate Director of the Americal Civil
Liberties Union, added, "Based on their past record it is quite
clear that if Federal law enforcement agencies like the FBI
begin to monitor the use of Federal government websites and
networks by ordinary people that they will seek ever greater
surveillance powers and will abuse whatever power is given to
them."
Also testifying at the hearing were John Tritak, Director,
Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office and Frank Cilluffo,
Senior Policy Analyst, Center for Strategic and International
Studies
The Electronic Privacy information Center is a public interest
research organization located in Washington, D.C.
[http://www.epic.org]
EPIC has also conducted a series of Freedom of Information
Act lawsuits to determine the extent of government
monitoring of American citizens. For more information, see
the EPIC Open Government page
[http://www.epic.org/open_gov]
EPIC report "Critical Infrastructure Protection and the
Endangerment of Civil Liberties" is available for sale at the
EPIC Bookstore along with other publications on privacy,
encryption, and free expression
[http://www.epic.org/bookstore]
Also, see the ACLU Cyber-Liberties webpage
[http://www.aclu.org]
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
edited by
published on: 2000-02-01
comments to office@quintessenz.at
subscribe Newsletter
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
<<
^
>>
|
|
|
|