|
search / subscribe / upload / contact |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| RSS-Feed Depeschen |  |
|
|
||
|
||
Date: 1999-06-28
UK implantiert ENFOPOL-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- setzt die ENFOPOL Proposals um, Moratorium des EU- Ministerrats, Proteste der GSM & Internet/provider, von Bürgerrechtlern & der ganz normalen Community, hin oder her. Andere [sozialdemokratische] Regierungen werden folgen, so war das seit dem Treffen von Trevi 1993 intendiert. Das österreichische Polizei/befugnis/gesetz, ein weiterer Klon von ENFOPOL, ist nur deshalb noch immer in der Schwebe, weil Wahlen anstehen. Wir werden uns noch wundern, wenn sie vorüber sind. Duncan Campbell 28.06.99 Consultation paper on the Interception of Communications published in circumstances intended to minimise reporting or public discussion. Controversial new plans for intercepting e-mail, the Internet, pagers, mobile phones and all new types telecommunications services were proposed in Britain last week. If the new law is passed as proposed, all "communications service providers" (CSPs) will be required at their own expense to build in government interception facilitities to their networks. The proposed new law follows the specifications secretly agreed by European police officials in the ENFOPOL plans revealed last year. Legal obligations to be imposed on CSPs will include all Internet Service Providers operating in the UK, whether large or small. It will also cover "interception of business telecommunication services, ranging from basic networks of a few lines found within a small office to large networks linking offices, in both the public and private sectors". Developing or introducing new networks or systems which cannot be monitored will breach the new interception law, according to the British Home Office. The need to provide interception interfaces "will be an ongoing requirement which CSPs will have to consider each time they develop their network or introduce new services". The government expects the British telecommunications industry, not the police, to pay all the costs of installing tapping facilities. They expect CSPs "Communication Service Providers to pay for the provision and maintenance of the basic intercept capability defined in the requirements issued by the Secretary of State". Voll Text http://www.telepolis.de/tp/english/inhalt/te/2989/1.html -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- edited by Harkank published on: 1999-06-28 comments to office@quintessenz.at subscribe Newsletter - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
|
|
|
 |
related topiqs |
 |
CURRENTLY RUNNING |
q/Talk 1.Juli: The Danger of Software Users Don't Control
|
|
|
!WATCH OUT! |
bits4free 14.Juli 2011: OpenStreetMap Erfinder Steve Coast live in Wien
|
|