|
search / subscribe / upload / contact |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| RSS-Feed Depeschen |  |
|
|
||
|
||
Date: 1999-06-22
Krypto/export: Fall Bernstein wieder aufgerollt, DOJ gibt nicht auf-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- das unlängst gefällt Urteil des 9th Circuit an. Drei Richter hatten entschieden, daß die von der Clinton- Administration forcierten Exportbeschränkungen für Kryptographie gegen das Recht auf freie Meinungsäußerung verstoßen und erkannten das Recht des Programmierers Daniel Bernstein an, den von ihm geschriebenen Source/code eines Krypto/programms zu exportieren. Backgrounds http://futurezone.orf.at/futurezone.orf?read=detail&id=907 -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- relayed by Alex Fowler <afowler@eff.org> DOJ Seeks Rehearing of Landmark Ruling in Bernstein Encryption Case CONTACTS: Cindy Cohn, McGlashan and Sarrail (650) 341-2585; cindy@mcglashan.com Alex Fowler, Electronic Frontier Foundation (415) 436-9333, x103; afowler@eff.org As expected, the U.S. Government today sought further review by the 9th Circuit of a 3 judge panel's recent decision holding that the federal government's regulations of encryption is unconstitutional. The Petition, which seeks both rehearing from the panel and rehearing en banc by an 11 judge panel, asserts two basic arguments, neither of which is new to the case. The government argues that the 9th Circuit panel incorrectly determined that the export restrictions on source code are facially unconstitutional. This argument is based upon an entirely unsupported assertion that source code is only used expressively "on occasion." "This should come as a big surprise to the millions of people who study, write, read, and develop their ideas using programming languages," noted lead counsel, Cindy Cohn. "This includes most of the inhabitants of Silicon Valley, as well as the mathematics, physics, computer science and other departments of high schools, universities, and businesses worldwide where such expressions are written, read, and reviewed daily. It is also is directly contradicted by evidence included in the record of this case." The government also argues that the court should have rewritten the regulations to make them Constitutional rather than strike them down. By this, the government is asking the Court to step into the shoes of the agency and rewrite the regulations. "Obviously this is not a proper role for a court," stated Ms. Cohn. "Indeed had the Court done so the government would have protested the 'judicial activism' of the Court. Writing regulations that meet the constitutional standards for free speech is certainly within the abilities of the Commerce Department." "In sum, the Petition for Rehearing is not surprising, nor does it raise any new arguments," Cohn concluded. "It instead indicates the intention of the Government to delay justice for Professor Bernstein, as well as the many others who are restricted by the encryption regulations, for as long as possible." Background The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on May 6, 1999 that the federal government's restrictions on encryption are unconstitutional, affirming a lower court's ruling that export control over cryptographic "software and related devices and technology are in violation of the First Amendment on the grounds of prior restraint." The case has been sponsored by EFF since 1995 because of its importance to society, free expression, electronic commerce, and privacy in the digital world. Encryption, the process of coding and decoding computerized information, is the most critical technological solution to protecting privacy and keeping computer networks secure. Acknowledging this point, the appeals court said "[t]he availability and use of secure encryption may offer an opportunity to reclaim some portion of the privacy we have lost. Government efforts to control encryption thus may well implicate not only the First Amendment rights of cryptographers intent on pushing the boundaries of their science, but also the constitutional rights of each of us as potential recipients of encryption's bounty." The EFF Bernstein legal team consists of: Cindy A. Cohn, McGlashan & Sarrail; Lee Tien; James Wheaton & Elizabeth Pritzker, First Amendment Project; Robert Corn-Revere, Hogan & Hartson; M. Edward Ross, Steefel, Levitt & Weiss; and Dean Morehous & Sheri A. Byrne, Thelen, Reid and Priest. Details on the Bernstein case, including information on the lower court's rulings, are available on the Internet at http://www.eff.org/bernstein. * * * * * * * * The Electronic Frontier Foundation (http://www.eff.org) is the leading global organization linking technical architectures and legal frameworks to support the rights of individuals in an open society. Founded in 1990, EF F actively encourages and challenges industry and government to support free expression, privacy, and access in the information society. The Electronic Frontier Foundation maintains the 4th most-linked-to Web site in the world. ===----------------------------------------------=== Alexander Fowler Director, Strategic Initiatives Group Electronic Frontier Foundation E-mail: afowler@eff.org Tel: 415 436 9333, x103; Fax 415 436 9993 You can find EFF on the Web at <http://www.eff.org> -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- edited by published on: 1999-06-22 comments to office@quintessenz.at subscribe Newsletter - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
|
|
|
 |
related topiqs |
 |
CURRENTLY RUNNING |
q/Talk 1.Juli: The Danger of Software Users Don't Control
|
|
|
!WATCH OUT! |
bits4free 14.Juli 2011: OpenStreetMap Erfinder Steve Coast live in Wien
|
|