|
<<
^
>>
Date: 1998-06-07
net§copyright§gesetze: ACLU & EFF sagen threat to to privacy
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
q/depesche 98.6.7.1
net§copyright§gesetze: ACLU & EFF sagen threat to privacy
Genau gesagt handelt sichs um den sogenannten WIPO Copyright Treaties Implementation Act.So schauts
aus: Mucho Rechte für die Copyright§inhaber & Medien§knechte - mini für die Intelligenz.
from Barry Steinhardt <Barrys@eff.org> via Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
The Electronic Frontier Foundation The American Civil Liberties Union
1550 Bryant Street, Suite 725 122 Maryland Ave, NE
San Francisco, CA 94103 Washington, DC 20002
(415) 436-9333 (202) 544-1681
June 4, 1998
The Honorable Tom Bliley
United States House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Representative Bliley,
We write to you on behalf of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and
the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to urge you to reject H.R. 2281,
the WIPO Copyright Treaties Implementation Act.
H.R. 2281 poses a direct threat to the free speech and privacy rights of
online users. It would over-regulate emerging technologies, eliminate
existing privacy protections, outlaw reverse engineering that is necessary
for system security, outlaw system security measures such as encryption,
and weaken fair use privileges. While proponents of the bill describe it
as a compromise measure, the only thing being compromised is the
well-established balance between content owners and content users in the
digital world.
Three sections of the bill are especially threatening to privacy, free
speech, and computer security:
Section 1201 makes the use, manufacture or sale of any technology that can
be used to circumvent copyright protections illegal. A host of vital
technologies, equipment and processes can be used for, but are not intended
to be used for, such abuse, and Congress should not outlaw them any more
than you should outlaw the making or sale of crowbars or baseball bats
because they can be used for vandalism. This section will:
· Make it illegal for a user to circumvent technological protections put on
his own materials by a piece of equipment. Many digital recorders forbid
the making of any digital copies, including copies of a user's own
creations. H.R. 2281 would make the circumvention of these technological
measures, and the manufacture of devices that would facilitate this
circumvention, criminal.
· Criminalize the manufacture, import, or use of tools necessary to perform
research in cryptography. Under H.R. 2281, the manufacture of software
tools that test the viability of a proposed encryption algorithm would be
prohibited.
· Impede the ability of system operators to find and correct weaknesses in
their systems. System operators have important, legitimate reasons to
attempt to circumvent such access control technologies to confirm the
security of the password file or other vulnerable elements of the system.
They must be able to use or create software that circumvents access control
technologies to determine the robustness of the security system.
· Prevent computer users from protecting their privacy online by removing
"cookies"--files automatically and covertly placed on users' computers by
web site programs--from their computer. Additionally, if cookies are used
as a copyright protection system, it would be unlawful to manufacture a
device that removes the cookie from the system.
Section 1202 allows for the collection of personally identifiable
information as part of the Copyright Management System. This section will:
· Allow content owners to collect personally-identifiable information about
users who access their copyrighted works. This will eliminate anonymous
reading and allow content owners to track not only which online magazines
citizens buy, but also which articles they read and which pictures they
look at.
Section 201 encourages system operators to violate the privacy and
protected speech rights of their users. This section will:
· Exempt service providers from liability if they disable access to or
remove material claimed to be infringing, regardless of whether the
material or activity is ultimately determined to be infringing. This
encourages them to remove potentially protected speech without any real
proof of infringement.
· Permit service providers to violate users' privacy by sifting through
customers' electronic files, documents and e-mail looking for potential
infringements.
Indeed, the restrictions on privacy rights and tools contained in this bill
run contrary to the efforts of members of Congress and the Administration
to provide adequate privacy protections in the digital world.
H.R. 2281 goes beyond what is required by the WIPO treaties and expands the
scope of current copyright law by punishing anyone who circumvents
technological measures that protect copyright, regardless of whether there
was any intent to infringe. This bill also would impose penalties on those
who make or distribute technologies capable of breaking copyright
protections. These classifications are broad and vague and could apply to
computer manufacturers, software companies, and many others engaged in
legitimate businesses having nothing to do with encouraging copyright
infringement.
A bill that does a much better job of striking the balance between content
owners and information users in the digital world is the Digital Era
Copyright Enhancement Act, H.R. 3048. Sponsored by Representatives Boucher
and Campbell, H.R. 3048 is a comprehensive bill that would encourage the
development of new technologies and markets for copyrighted works in
digital form. H.R. 3048 would punish the behavior of circumventing
copyright protections with the intent to infringe on another's copyright,
rather than outlawing all devices that could be used for circumvention.
In addition, H.R. 3048 updates Section 107 (Fair Use) and other sections of
the Copyright Act to ensure that libraries, students, educators, and
nonprofit organizations enjoy the same limited freedoms to use copyrighted
materials they have in the nondigital world. Teachers could make limited
copies of classroom materials for distance learning, where their
"classrooms" are expanded over the Internet, without fear of copyright
infringement. Librarians and other archivists could update obsolete
storage media (such as microfiche) to newer, more efficient digital media.
The WIPO Copyright Treaties Implementation Act, H.R. 2281, is a dangerous
bill that will undermine the delicate balance that has been struck in over
200 years of copyright history in this country. EFF and the ACLU urge you
to vote against H.R. 2281.
If we can provide you with additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact either of us at the numbers above. Thank you for your
consideration of our concerns.
Respectfully yours,
Barry Steinhardt
President,EFF
Laura Murphy
Director ACLU Washington Office
Barry Steinhardt East Cost Phone 212 549 2508
President East Coast Fax 212 549 2656
Electronic Frontier Foundation West Coast Phone 415 436 9333 ext 102
1550 Bryant St. Suite 725 West Coast Fax 415 436 9993
San Francisco, CA 94103 <http://www.eff.org>
Barrys@eff.org
-.-.- --.- -.-.- --.- -.-.- --.-
TIP
Download free PGP 5.5.3i (Win95/NT & Mac) from Arge Daten
http://keyserver.ad.or.at/pgp/download/
-.-.- --.- -.-.- --.- -.-.- --.-
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
edited by Harkank
published on: 1998-06-07
comments to office@quintessenz.at
subscribe Newsletter
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
<<
^
>>
|
|
|
|